About this publication
English policy edition. The main guide is available in Italian.
This page applies to the editorial publication Biofarm Orto. It concerns reading this website and following its links. It does not replace the policies of a generator, payment provider or review publication that you visit separately.
What the publication covers
Our subject is choosing tools for synthetic images and video. We explain differences between generating a new scene, editing authorized material and producing a sequence that remains consistent over time. Coverage is intended for adults. Examples and use cases concern fictional adult characters or work with adults who have explicitly agreed to the intended processing and distribution. We do not provide an image generator, accept image uploads or sell credits for another service.
The publication name identifies this website. It does not establish a relationship with a business, professional practice or organization that happens to use similar words. We do not offer clinical advice, professional treatment or any of the physical goods a reader might associate with the name. The subject and limits of this edition are stated on the main guide.
The main guide has a defined subject rather than a list of unrelated search phrases. It offers questions a reader can use to evaluate a service: what output is needed, which operations a plan includes, how files can be exported and what happens to supplied material. These questions remain useful even when a particular provider changes its feature list or pricing.
Ownership and linked publications
This publication and the linked Clothoff review project are operated by the same team. A link between them is an editorial cross-link within that publishing activity. It should not be read as an independent endorsement by an unrelated organization. The name of a publication also does not establish that it operates a generator with a similar name. Read the destination’s own description to understand its role.
What we can substantiate
Our guides distinguish suggested evaluation criteria from measured results. We do not assign a product score, state that an application passed a hands-on test or promise a deletion period unless there is evidence for that specific statement. Describing what a reader should check is different from asserting that a provider already meets that standard. A vendor’s public description is evidence of its claim, not independent evidence of its performance.
Corrections and reader questions
Dates identify substantive editions rather than a daily refresh of unchanged text. A correction should identify the page, the disputed statement and a supporting public source. The methodology explains how evidence is handled, while the contact and reporting page explains the currently available routes and their limits. For general privacy authority information, use the EDPB directory. Do not send private images as a way to prove a factual correction.